Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP


March 2026
 
  • Square Mile rating
  • Risk of asset class
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  • Ongoing charges
    0.59%
    Transaction costs
    0.13%
    Total cost of investment
    0.72%

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 31st January 2026.


Overview

The Artemis Strategic Bond Fund aims to provide a combination of income and capital growth over a five year period. By shifting between different types of bonds as the economic cycle turns and as market conditions change, the managers aim to preserve capital in difficult times and to profit when conditions improve.

 

Square Mile’s Expected Outcome

We believe that the fund should be able to provide a return of 2.5% p.a. over SONIA, over rolling five year periods.


Square Mile’s Opinion

We believe the combination of different fixed income expertise brought together by the three portfolio managers under the new investment approach is working well for the fund. The three portfolio managers bring their own ideas from their respective sectors and directly apply them to the portfolio. They have gelled well together over a relatively short period of time. For this process it helped that David and Liam worked together for 6 years at Standard Life and David and Grace have worked together since 2016. The main change to the investment process is in the portfolio implementation, where each portfolio manager is responsible for the allocation across investment grade, high yield and rates. They bring their best ideas from their respective areas of expertise and implement them as a collective, David Ennett being the senior member and ‘casting vote' as required.
 
One big benefit from the new approach is that the decision making is quick, the PMs are the specialists from their sectors and implement the decisions as they see fit, without the need to present it to various committees for approval.
 
We find that the new managers have established their process and philosophy on the portfolio which can now be considered their own. The discretionary approach and collective management, utilising their individual areas of expertise in the investment decision making process and portfolio construction, has delivered a positive track record so far, since November 2023.
 
The fund offers a core approach to fixed income, within a mid-duration (4-6 years) structural exposure with the active management of the credit exposure and benefitting from the expertise of three motivated, skilful portfolio managers in their respective sectors.
 
We believe this is an attractive proposition for investors looking to delegate their exposure to fixed income.


Fund Manager’s Formal Objective

The fund seeks to provide a combination of income and capital growth over a five year period. 

Capital Accumulation, Income UK
Active Composite: 50% ICE BoA ML Sterling Corporates 1-10 year, 50% ICE BoA ML Global High Yield index (hedged to GBP)
Fixed Income IA Sterling Strategic Bond
4.69% £889M
David Ennett, Grace Le, Liam O'Donnell January, April, July, October
0.8 Pounds Quarterly
GBP 01/04/2014
0.8 Pounds 31/03/2025
0.00% -
- -

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 31st January 2026

 
  PAGE 1 OF 6  
 
Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP
 
 

Asset Manager Overview

Artemis is an investment management business which was founded in 1997. Since then, it has grown and as of the end of January 2025, it had circa £28 billion of assets under management across a range of investment funds, investment trusts and segregated mandates. The firm is 100% owned by the management team at Artemis and Affiliate Management Group, with the latter taking a share in revenues but not involved in day-to-day management.
 
The firm operates under a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and currently has circa 30 partners made up of fund managers and other key individuals in the firm. This approach to ownership has meant the firm has been able to retain key individuals in the business, with fund manager turnover relatively low. In addition, fund managers typically invest in the funds that they and their fellow managers run, ensuring their interests remain aligned with those of their investors. Each of the firm's investment teams operate independently and so are free to pursue different investment philosophies and processes, with the managers wholly accountable for the assets they manage.

Fund Manager/Team Overview

The portfolio is managed by a team of three co-portfolio managers: David Ennett, Grace Le and Liam O'Donnell. There is some familiarity in the new team as David and Liam worked together at Aberdeen Investments in addition to Grace working alongside David at Aegon. They bring their best ideas from their respective areas of expertise and implement them as a collective.
 
David, high yield portfolio manager, joined Artemis in February 2019 from Aegon, where he was Head of High Yield since 2016. Prior to this, he was Head of European High Yield at Standard Life Investments and previously a high yield portfolio manager at Old Mutual Asset Managers.
Grace, investment grade portfolio manager, joined Artemis in December 2019 from Aegon, where she was a co-manager in a range of investment grade bond funds.
Liam leads the Artemis fixed income team's strategy on macro and rates. He joined Artemis in November 2023, coming from Standard Life Investments, where he developed his career first as a risk manager in 2010, before moving to the rates team in 2012 and becoming head of UK rates in 2018.

They are supported by two high yield analysts, one credit analyst and two dealers, as part of the wider Artemis Fixed Income team led by Stephen Snowden.

Investment Philosophy & Process Overview

The Artemis Strategic Bond fund is an unconstrained strategy with the flexibility to allocate across the entire fixed income spectrum. The portfolio managers take a dynamic approach to portfolio positioning to take advantage of the different stages of the economic cycle. The fund will employ a longer term strategic and thematic approach, investing with a core exposure to corporate investment grade, typically between 30-60%; to high yield corporate bonds, typically between 20-50%; and to government bonds, typically between 10-20%. The managers will also seek short term tactical opportunities to take advantage of market moves.

The managers follow a simple, pragmatic approach, with structural allocations across the sub asset classes broadly unchanged, and looking for the best risk return profile from each asset class at any time. The corporate investment grade and high yield exposure is taken directly in cash bonds, whilst for the rates bucket, the dedicated manager makes extensive use of derivatives to take relative value (long and short) positions across the yield curve and cross country positions. There is no currency risk in the portfolio, all currency risk is hedged back to base currency (GBP).

The three portfolio managers jointly form an asset allocation view to set up the credit and interest rate exposure of the fund. Once the macro view and risk appetite has been established, each of them has the freedom to implement their bottom-up ideas in their respective buckets: Liam in yield curve, cross markets and inflation markets, David in high yield across ratings, sectors with active security selection and relative value trades, and Grace in investment grade corporates across ratings, sectors with active security selection and relative value trades.

Active stock selection plays a fundamental role of the strategy and investment process. Individual stock selection is critical at all levels of the credit ratings spectrum. Each manager is an expert in their respective segment of the fixed income market and seeks to add value within their allocations. They bring their best ideas to this portfolio, regardless of benchmark weights in their sectors. For example, David Ennett invests across 40-50 high yield issuers for the Strategic Bond, whereas he invests in over 100 issuers in the single-strategy global high yield fund. While the corporate investment grade allocation is more diversified, Grace Le has more flexibility to invest in her best ideas, as within the Strategic Bond fund she does not have to manage the portfolio relative to a benchmark.

 
  PAGE 2 OF 6  
 
Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP
 
 

ESG Integration

Fund ESG Integration

The fund has no specific sustainable goals, but rather, incorporates ESG factors within its investment decision making framework. The managers view sustainability as a risk, as part of broader fundamental analysis. They take a pragmatic approach, thinking economics, not ethics, with a focus on ESG momentum rather than on absolute rating.
 
The managers use ESG information provided by a variety of third-party research providers as inputs into the decision-making process. These providers include sell-side research, MSCI and TruValue Labs. They use their external scores and input to assess ESG risks and opportunities. These scores do not determine the stocks held in the portfolios, but help to make an informed decision.

 
 
  PAGE 3 OF 6  
 
Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP
 
 

Risk Summary

This fund has a flexible mandate, and so different risks may dominate at different points of the economic cycle. It invests in fixed income instruments, and so the dominant risks are likely to be interest rate risk and credit risk. The managers look to mitigate these risks through active asset allocation, interest rate risk management and detailed bottom-up security analysis. However, investors should be aware that at times these risks are likely to be significant. For example, the managers invest in sub-investment grade debt and, at times in the economic cycle, such positions may be significant, resulting in increased credit risk in the fund. Despite the team’s careful analysis of the bonds in the fund, all corporate bonds carry a risk of default and investors should be aware that it is possible that a bond in the fund could default on its obligations. However, as this fund is well diversified, the impact of any one bond defaulting should be small. Derivatives are used both for risk management purposes and to gain exposure to specific markets or securities where the managers believe it is appropriate to do so. Derivatives can often be the most efficient way to establish specific positions, both in terms of costs and liquidity, but investors should be aware that there may be times when the derivatives markets do not reflect what is happening in the physical markets upon which they are based, especially during times of market stress. Overall, we believe that the managers are very capable of navigating the various risks inherent in the investments which they make, to the benefit of investors, through the cycle.

 

Additional Information

6.21%
5.01%
-6.36%
5.54%
-3.59%
1.03
1.08

(3 years data to last month end unless otherwise stated)

Qualitative Risk Assessment

Significant Potentially Significant Not Significant

For the full summary of the risks, click here

 
  PAGE 4 OF 6  
 
Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP
 
 

3 Year Rolling Sector Outperformance

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 12th March 2026. Share price total return.

 

Maximum Drawdown (Rolling 12 Months)

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 12th March 2026

 

Calendar Year Performance To Quarter End

Period Fund (%) Sector (%)
2025 8.5 7.2
2024 5.1 4.4
2023 8.0 7.9
2022 -10.5 -12.0
2021 0.7 0.9

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 30th March 2026


Value for Money

The total cost of investment (TCI) of this fund is comfortably below the median of the sector, and we believe that this represents very good value for money. This is particularly so, when considering that the fund gives access not just to the security selection and trading skills of the managers and the wider Artemis team, but also to the asset allocation expertise within the fixed income universe, allowing investors to hold the fund throughout the market cycle.

OCF v Peer Group

0.59%
Transaction Costs v Peer Group

0.13%
TCI v Peer Group

0.72%

Source: Square Mile and LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved), Data as at: 31st January 2026.

 
  PAGE 5 OF 6  
 
Artemis Strategic Bond I Quarterly Inc GBP
 
 

Square Mile Analysts

Scott Heaney - Investment Research Analyst

Henry Wix Pollard - Investment Research Analyst

Rating Changes

The Square Mile ratings are reviewed every 6 months. For full details on the methodologies, click here.
For a full list of all Square Mile rated funds, click here.

Rating Changes over last 12 months Time & Date rating changed
 

Disclaimer

This document is issued by Square Mile Investment Consulting and Research Limited which is registered in England and Wales (08791142) and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Titan Wealth Holdings Limited (Registered Address: 101 Wigmore Street, London, W1U 1QU).

Unless otherwise agreed by Square Mile, this factsheet is only for internal use by the permitted recipients and shall not be published or be provided to any third parties. This factsheet is for the use of professional advisers and other regulated firms only and should not be relied upon by any other persons. It is published by, and remains the copyright of, Square Mile Investment Consulting and Research Ltd (“SM”). SM makes no warranties or representations regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. This information represents the views and forecasts of SM at the date of issue but may be subject to change without reference or notification to you. SM does not offer investment advice or make recommendations regarding investments and nothing in this factsheet shall be deemed to constitute financial or investment advice in any way and shall not constitute a regulated activity for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. This factsheet shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute an invitation or inducement to any person to engage in investment activity. Should you undertake any investment activity based on information contained herein, you do so entirely at your own risk and SM shall have no liability whatsoever for any loss, damage, costs or expenses incurred or suffered by you as a result. SM does not accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or any inconsistencies herein. Unless indicated, all figures are sourced by LSEG Lipper (all rights reserved). Past performance is not a guide to future returns.

  PAGE 6 OF 6