Asset Manager Overview
Royal London Asset Management (RLAM) is part of the Royal London Group which is the UK's largest mutual pension and investment provider. Established in 1988, it manages c.£181 billion in assets (as at end June 2025). The Sustainable Leaders fund was previously a Co-op Asset Management (COAM) fund but became a Royal London fund when RLAM bought COAM in 2013. Mr Fox is head of the sustainable equities team and has managed the fund since 2003.
Fund Manager/Team Overview
Mike Fox was appointed as manager of this fund in November 2003, and is ably supported by a highly collegiate and stable SI team, which he heads, at RLAM. There have been few changes to the composition of the team over recent years, with additional joiners augmenting what has proved to be stable resource. We would highlight that there is a significant resource dedicated to sustainable investing at RLAM. The sustainable equities team number's nine, with an additional seven in sustainable credit and 17 in the wider responsible investment team. The external advisory committee, which is another layer of due diligence, challenge and advice comprises of four personnel. Although this fund has four named managers, the portfolio construction aspect of the process lies firmly with Mr Fox, and therefore, within the given investment parameters, it is at his discretion as to the weightings of the respective holdings.
Investment Philosophy & Process Overview
The SI team's research approach combines financial analysis and ESG analysis. The team only offers sustainable funds i.e. it does not have a non-sustainable range. The belief of the team is that the sustainability of a business will drive its financials providing that the business is fundamentally sound. Mr Fox, architect of the process, believes that a good process gives you the right information and allows you to make better judgements. He also believes that the process should be responsive to change and be able to evolve. Unlike many older 'SRI' or 'ethical' funds, the investment process here is based more around positive screening than negative exclusions, although there are a number of hurdles for a business to get over before positive characteristics are assessed. Stocks held in the portfolio generally will be having a positive benefit on society and/or the environment in some way and will be showing leadership in their field. Again, unlike some traditional 'ethical or dark green' funds the portfolio will hold a number of larger businesses which are leaders in their field. This is based on the premise that really only larger companies can influence change.
The team understands that investing sustainably is subjective and it will mean different things to each investor, therefore, they keep the approach fluid and adaptable. The team members embrace the subjective nature of this method of investing and adapt to the times. Their success on the fund (and the range) historically has partly been down to their adaptability. The fund and approach might be considered 'lighter green' than many others in the market, but we would stress that there remains a high hurdle rate for inclusion. Should a business experience problems with its ESG credentials then this would be assessed in a similar way to the financial concerns of a company. There are a small number of negative screens which includes companies that are likely to be exposed to human rights abuses, tobacco and armaments manufacture, products which involve experiments on animals, except for those conducted for the benefit of human or animal health, and the generation of nuclear power. The fund also avoids investments in companies which derive a material proportion of their business from animal fur products, pornography, irresponsible gambling, irresponsible drinking and worker exploitation or exploitative consumer practices. Finally, companies are avoided that have unacceptable corporate governance and mismanage social, ethical and environmental risk.
| |
|